Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian

 

Perhaps the most famous secular source outside the Bible who twice made reference to Jesus as a real historical figure was a Jewish Pharisee turned Roman citizen and historian. Born in 37 AD as Joseph son of High Priest Matthias is better known by his Roman name Flavius Josephus.

Born during the first year of Caligula’s (Caius) reign meant Josephus grew up during the era of Jesus’ disciples, the beginning of Christianity.[1]

Josephus was appointed by the Sanhedrin to be the governor of Galilee and served as its military General commanding over 100,000 men. As a result of Jewish political treachery on multiple fronts, it led to his eventual defeat and capture by Roman Legion commander Vespasian.

Eventually befriending his Roman captor, Josephus told Vespasian he would one day become Emperor of Rome, a concept that did not seem possible at the time. Vespasian did indeed become Emperor of Rome within two years.

As Emperor, Vespasian granted Josephus Roman citizenship and was then employed by the Roman government as a Jewish historian.[2] His responsibility as a historian was to cover the historical account of the Jews with a focus on Greek influences.[3]

While Josephus had enemies among both the Jewish and Roman populations, he was trusted by the house of Vespasian. He eventually went on to serve both of Vespasian’s sons, Titus and Domitian, each of whom also ruled as Roman Emperors.

The Antiquity of the Jews consisting of 20 books written by Josephus is considered by some to be one of the greatest works of antiquity. It chronicles Hebrew history from creation of the earth to the era of Roman Emperor Nero and Procurator Florus.

Previously Josephus penned The Jewish Wars consisting of seven books chronicling his unique experiences and insights, both from the perspective as a Jewish General and as an eyewitness from a Roman military perspective to the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus. Two other works by him included Against Apion and his autobiography, The Life of Josephus.

Today, in-spite-of critics charging that he embellished some of the accounts, Josephus’ works are widely accepted to be authentic, factual Jewish historical accounts.[3] That is, except for one particular section making reference to Jesus by name, commonly referred to by scholars as the Testimonium Flavianum.[4]

Conspiracy theorists allege that Christian scribes intentionally manipulated the handwritten texts of the Testimonium where 133 copies are still in existence today, in part or in whole, dating back to 324 AD.[5] Quoted from Antiquities is the Testimonium with the most commonly alleged interpolations appearing in italics: [6]

“Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure: he drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles also: this was the Christ.  And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men among us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first, did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these, and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him.  And still the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.”[7]

One undisputed key phrase is “Jesus, a wise man” whereas the phrase “this was the Christ” is disputed. Taking out the disputed phrases still leaves in place the portions of Josephus’ account that says a wise man named Jesus drew many followers including Gentiles, known as Christians, and he was crucified by order of Pilate.

A curious fact, typically unmentioned by Christian conspiracy theorists, is that Josephus made another reference to Jesus. Typically not disputed, the historian wrote in a second reference of Antiquities that Jesus “who was called Christ”:

“…Ananus was of this disposition, he thought he had now a proper opportunity [to exercise his authority].  Festus was now dead, and Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the Sanhedrin of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others, [or, some of his companions.]  And when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned…”[8]

Undisputed perhaps for good cause – too much specific historical detail to explain away. A highly charged political issue involving a King, a Roman Procurator, an illegal Sanhedrin-ordered execution, a formal Jewish complaint to Rome and the forced removal of the High Priest would be very difficult to make a reasonable claim of interpolation.

Two secular references are made by Josephus to a historical figure named Jesus, the “Christ,” the Greek word for “Messiah,” but only one is disputed by critics. How likely is it that one is an interpolation while the other is not?

 

Update October 17, 2023.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

REFERENCES:

[1] “Flavius Josephus,” Jewish Encyclopedia. 2011. <http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com>  “Flavius Josephus.” Encyclopædia Britannica.  2014. <http://www.britannica.com>   “Josephus.”  Livius.org. Ed. Jona Lendering. 2016. <http://www.livius.org/person/augustus> White, L. Michael. “Josephus, Our Primary Source.” PBS|Frontline. Apr. 1998. <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/portrait/josephus.html>  Josephus, Flavius. The Complete Works of Josephus. image. 1850. <http://books.google.com/books?id=e0dAAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false>  Josephus, Flavius.  The Life of Flavius Josephus. The Complete Works of Josephus. Trans. and Commentary by William Whitson. 1-2. <http://books.google.com/books?id=e0dAAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false> Josephus, Flavius. Antiquities of the Jews. Book XVIII, Chapter VI.3; Book XIX, Chapter VI.4; Book XX, Chapter VIII.7.
[2] Josephus. The Life of Flavius Josephus.  Suetonius (C. Suetonius Tranquillus or C. Tranquillus Suetonius).  The Lives of the Twelve Caesars.  Book VIII, “Tacitus,” #6.  University of Chicago|Bill Thayer.  <http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Suetonius/12Caesars/home.html>
[3] Josephus, Flavius. Antiquities of the Jews. Book XX, Chapter XI.2. n.d <http://books.google.com/books?id=e0dAAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false> Carrier, Richard C. “Herod the Procurator:  Was Herod the Great a Roman Governor of Syria?” 2011. p 7-8. <https://www.academia.edu/1203990/Herod_the_Procurator_Was_Herod_the_Great_a_Roman_Governor_of_Syria?email_work_card=view-paper
[4] “Josephus, Flavius.” Jewish Encyclopedia.  2011.   “Flavius Josephus.” Encyclopædia Britannica.
[5] Goldberg, G. J. “Josephus’ Account of Jesus – The Testimonium Flavianum”.  Josephus.org. <http://www.josephus.org/testimonium.htm>
[6] Van Voorst, Robert E. Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence. Pages 93-96.  Google Books. <http://books.google.com/books?id=lwzliMSRGGkCEncyclopaedia Judaica. Vol. 11. 2nd edition.  Gale Virtual Reference Library. “Jesus.” Pages: 246-251.  <http://go.galegroup.com/ps/infomark.do?action=interpret&eisbn=9780028660974&prodId=GVRL&userGroupName=imcpl1111&type=aboutBook&version=1.0&authCount=1&u=imcpl1111>
[7] Westcott, Brooke F. & Hort, John A. The New Testament in the Original Greek – Introduction | Appendix.  1907.  “Introduction , #7, #10, #5, #6-11, #240, #313, #363. Google Book.  <http://books.google.com/books?id=0xtVAAAAMAAJ&pg=ACfU3U33CMW3331Vv20NgGvjyOs52I1mlA&vq=%22will+not+be+out+of+place+to+add+here+a+distinct+expression+of+our+belief+that+even+among+the+numerous%22&source=gbs_quotes_r&cad=2_0#v=onepage&q=criticism%20is%20still%20necessary%20&f=false>
[8] Josephus.  Antiquities of the Jews. Book XX, Chapter IX.1.
[9] CR Josephus. Antiquities of the Jews. Book XX, Chapter IX.4.

Jesus of Nazareth – a Real Historical Figure?

 

Media today widely treats Jesus of Nazareth as a real historical figure. Evidence can be seen in many forms such as via NBC, National Geographic and The History Channel.

Premises of these media presentations is based on the factualness of the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem during the end of King Herod’s reign; his Roman crucifixion at Jerusalem, and the claims of his Resurrection that spawned a new religion.

The History Channel mini-series The Bible in 2013 became the adaption into the 2014 major motion picture release of Son of God. The next year this was followed with the 2015 NBC mini-series A.D.: Beyond the Bible picking up where the Gospels ended with the crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus.[1]

National Geographic in 2015 published the hard cover book Jesus: An Illustrated Life where its website promo begins by saying “Two thousand years after his death, Jesus of Nazareth remains one of history’s most influential and fascinating figures.” The 2016 spin-off magazine special edition entitled The Story of Jesus states “Jesus of Nazareth remains one of history’s most influential and fascinating figures.”[2]

New York Times reported decades earlier in 1977 an article entitled Jesus of Nazareth which was then turned into a 6 hour TV episode that later aired on NBC.[3] US News & World Report magazine ran as its cover story on April 16, 1990, The Last Days of Jesus: The new light on what happened based on the premise that Jesus was a real person who lived, died and quite possibly rose from the dead.

Movies, books and magazines do not necessarily prove Jesus was a true historical figure. While many may react by thinking the historicity of Jesus is an established fact, there are those who are skeptical with some adamantly insisting he never existed at all and, as a consequence, Jesus cannot then be the Son of God.

Of those skeptics who do not believe the historical reality of Jesus of Nazareth, that small percentage still translates into millions of people. Many consider themselves to be agnostics or atheists, but not all.

Theories against the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth fall into two basic areas. One is based on a passive form of legend that developed over centuries about a figure known as Jesus.

Another theory is loosely centered on some manner of Christian conspiracy where Christian activists created a fictitious messiah figure, some believing it is a full blown conspiracy.[4] Quotes from the promo webpage for the aptly named book, The Christ Conspiracy by D. M. Murdock, are examples of these views:[5]

“Jesus is a mythical figure in the tradition of pagan mythology and almost nothing in all of ancient literature would lead one to believe otherwise. Anyone wanting to believe Jesus lived and walked as a real live human being must do so despite the evidence, not because of it.” – C. Dennis McKinsey

“The gospel story is an artificial, non-historical work. It has been fabricated from source materials that can be identified and traced to their incorporation into the gospels. There is not a particle of hard evidence that ‘Jesus of Nazareth’ ever existed.” – Harold Leidner

Standing opposed to these charges are diverse sources outside the Bible reaching back through the centuries to within just a few years after the Roman destruction of the Jerusalem Temple in 70 AD. They come from Roman era sources; major, non-Christian religions – even some atheists.

Credentials of these historical sources are important in weighing the integrity of their statements in-spite-of their antagonism. One is these is the highly recognized Roman historian of the Jews, Josephus, himself a former Jewish Pharisee priest and military General. Others include prominent Roman historical figures such as Tacitus and Suetonius. Perhaps the most credible sources are two major world religions, Judaism and Islam.

Some sources do not directly discuss the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, but in denouncing or criticizing the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth, they have conceded by inference that he was born, lived and walked this earth. Others refer to the crucifixion of Jesus, a recognition that he once lived in order to be crucified.

Virtually all the sources that corroborate the historical existence of Jesus of Nazareth are antagonistic toward Christianity. When opposing forces agree on a common point of information, it becomes the strongest form of a truth because both sides have essentially established – willingly or reluctantly – that it is a fact. Trial lawyers use this strategy to artfully extract common points of truth from witnesses to establish factual information. Using factual testimony of their opposing witnesses, they strengthen their own cases.

Over the past 2000 years up to this very day, the personage of Jesus of Nazareth has and continues to make a monumental impact on the world stage. Continually seen in current news stories, the name of Jesus still causes religious tensions, political turmoil, persecution, brutal atrocities of martyrdom and wars to be fought.[6]

What are the odds that all these consequences are the result of a false premise, one that says Jesus was not a real person? Something profound happened involving a historical figure two thousand years ago that forever changed history – even calendars – nevertheless, some will still continue to believe it is all a myth. Was Jesus of Nazareth a real person?

 

Updated November 11, 2022.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

REFERENCES:

[1] “The Bible.” A&E Television Networks, LLC. 2022. <https://www.history.com/shows/the-bible>  “Son of God.” IMDb.com, Inc. 2022. <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3210686> “Beyond AD.” NBCUniversal Media, LLC. <https://www.nbc.com/beyond-ad/about>  “Jesus of Nazareth. Amazon.co.UK. image. 2011. <https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61mjpUpOKcL._AC_SL1051_.jpg
[2] Isbouts, Jean-Pierre. “Jesus: An Illustrated Life.” National Geographic Society.2015. http://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Illustrated-Life-Jean-Pierre-Isbouts/dp/1426215681/ref=sr_1_1/185-6473608-4923818?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1462376067&sr=1-1&keywords=national+geographic+jesus>
[3] “Jesus of Nazareth.” The New York Times Company. 2022. <https://www.nytimes.com/1977/04/02/archives/long-island-opinion-tv-jesus-of-nazareth-starts-on-nbc-tomorrow.html>
[4] Gauvin, Marshall J. “Did Jesus Christ Really Live?” (ca. 1922).  Infidels.org. <http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/marshall_gauvin/did_jesus_really_live.html>
Ron Csillag. “For scholars, a combustible question: Was Christ real?” TheStar.com. 2008. <http://www.thestar.com/article/557548
“Was Jesus a Real Man?” The Atheist Apologist. 2010. <http://www.atheistapologist.com/2010/06/was-jesus-real-man.html>
“Historicity of Jesus.” New World Encyclopedia. 2012.  <http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Info:Main_Page>
Roussos, Ioannis. “On the Historicity of Jesus Christ.” Atheist Foundation of Australia. <http://atheistfoundation.org.au/article/on-the-historicity-of-jesus-christ rel=”nofollow”>
Rich, Tracey R. “Looking for Jesus?”, JewFAQ.org. <http://www.jewfaq.org/search.shtml?Keywords=what+about+Jesus>
Wolchover, Natalie.  “Proof of Jesus Christ?  7 Pieces of Evidence Debated.” 2013. LiveScience.com.  <http://www.livescience.com/38014-physical-evidence-jesus-debated.html>
Gloag, Paton J.  Introduction to the Synoptic Gospels. 1895.  “Introduction to the Synoptic Gospels.”  Online Books Page. <http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008728595>
[5] Murdock, D.M. aka S., Acharya.  The Christ Conspiracy.  Advertisement.  <http://www.truthbeknown.com/christ.htm rel=”nofollow”>
[6] Chiaramonte, Perry. “Christian persecution seen in more locations across the globe, new report shows.” February 02, 2017. <http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/02/02/christian-persecution-seen-in-more-locations-across-globe-new-report-shows.html>

A Different Kind of Logic

 

A very different kind of logic led two high-level U.S. government operatives to conclude that Jesus of Nazareth is, in fact, the Son of God, the Messiah. Their logic was not based on the circumstances related to the fulfillment of prophecies or the Gospel accounts of miracles and teachings by Jesus of love and forgiveness. Instead, they looked at it completely differently and asked themselves – what are the odds it could all be a lie?

Years ago in an appearance on CNBC, the distinguished moderator of NBC’s Meet the Press, the late Tim Russert, interviewed the late William F. Buckley. As a recognized intellectual, his biography is extremely impressive.

Buckley was a World War II veteran, served as a CIA station chief, founded the National Review magazine serving as its Editor at Large; an Emmy winning TV show host of Firing Line; awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom; a syndicated newspaper columnist; and authored of more than 40 books including Nearer, My God: An Autobiography of Faith.[1]

Russert asked Buckley, “Can you prove there is a God?” Buckley answered, “I can’t prove that Julius Caesar was assassinated nor can I prove that George Washington was a patriot.” He went on to explain the logic of his belief that Jesus is the Son of God was based on the behavior of his 11 Disciples.[2]

The former spy chief had led a secretive U.S. government agency whose counterintelligence agents placed their lives on the line every day to protect U.S. secrets around the globe. He asked himself what are the odds that the Disciples of Jesus would be willing to die horrible deaths in defense of what they had witnessed if it were not true? It seemed perfectly logical from Buckley’s perspective that these men would not willingly die to protect a lie about Jesus.

President Nixon’s Special Council included the late Charles Colson, known as the “White House hatchet man,” who was convicted and imprisoned for his role in Watergate.[3] Colson’s life-changing logic came later in life saying:

“What would inspire men to suffer and die for a belief?  Only one thing—the absolute certainty that their belief was true. Who would die to protect a lie or a hoax, especially if he knew it to be a lie?”[4]

As part of the Watergate conspiracy involving 12 of the most powerful men in the world, it took only 2 weeks for one of them to break and expose their cover up. From Colson’s unique perspective, the Disciples of Jesus went to their deaths never denying their proclamations about the Resurrection of Jesus. His conclusion was based on the logic that the Disciples would never have stood steadfastly in their belief through persecution, imprisonment, torture and death if what they experienced with Jesus was not true.

Unshakably, the Disciples’ personal involvement during a 3-year stint made them totally and completely committed to their belief that Jesus is the Son of God. They experienced and witnessed it; they were moved and torn by it; they shared and preached it, some even wrote about it. Ultimately all but one died tragic deaths, the one exception (John) was imprisoned all for proclaiming to the very end that Jesus is the Son of God.

Unique life experiences of Buckley and Colson, who worked with professional spies and deceivers at the highest levels of the U.S. government, led them to the same independent logical conclusion. These two men concluded that by the behavior of the Disciples, who were willing to die for what they believed, was a profound truth that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God.

Is their logic flawed or does it make sense?

 

Updated May 9, 2024.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

REFERENCES:

[1] “William F. Buckley Jr.” Biograpny.com. 2017. <http://www.biography.com/people/william-f-buckley-jr-9230494#synopsis>. “William F. Buckley Jr..” NationalReview.com. nd. <http://www.nationalreview.com/author/william-f-buckley-jr>
[2] William F. Buckley.  “Is there a God?” Talk show/Interview. CNBC. Host: Tim Russert. Aired 23 Nov. 1997.
[3] Colson, Charles. “How God Turned Around Nixon’s Hatchet Man.” The Veritas Forum. Columbia University. 23 April 2012. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_OqvFJhDRY>
[4] Colson, Chuck. “Secrets, Lies, and the Resurrection.” Break Point. 13 April 2006. <http://www.breakpoint.org/commentaries/5545-secrets-lies-and-the-resurrection>.